Growing faster than it collects
Winning more work consumes cash before it produces it. A facility that scales with the ledger removes the constraint that arrives precisely when things are going well.
Invoice finance funds the gap between issuing an invoice and being paid for it. It is not a loan against the future. It is an advance against work already done and already billed.
Last reviewed 8 September 2026
Indicative interest cost
Weekly
$162/week
Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.
Sending to Prospa
$60,000 drawn at 14.00% . Prospa will ask a few quick questions, then provide a firm quote and funding if eligible.
Redirecting…
The short version
The mechanism
The business invoices its customer as it always has. A copy goes to the funder, which checks the invoice is for work genuinely completed and that the customer is one it will fund, and advances a proportion of the value. That money is in the account inside a day or two rather than at the end of the customerโs payment terms.
The invoice is then collected in the ordinary way. Under a confidential arrangement the business does its own collections and the customer sees nothing different. When payment lands, the funder takes the advance it made plus its fees, and releases the remainder.
Nothing about the underlying trade changes. The customer gets the same terms, the same invoice and the same relationship, and the business has the cash three to six weeks earlier than it otherwise would. What has changed is that a receivable, which is an asset the balance sheet already recognised, has become spendable.
Day 0
Invoice issued
Day 1 to 2
Advance released
Day 30 to 60
Customer pays
On payment
Balance, less fees
Worked example
A subcontractor completes a stage of work and invoices $40,000 on 45-day terms. The funder advances 85%, which is $34,000, within two working days. The remaining $6,000 sits with the funder until the customer pays.
The customer pays on day 48. The funder takes its $34,000 advance back, along with a discount fee calculated on the advance for the 48 days it was outstanding and a service fee calculated on the invoice value. The balance goes to the business.
On indicative pricing of 1.2% per 30 days on the advance and 0.4% of invoice value as a service fee, the total cost of that transaction is in the order of $815, and the business had $34,000 to work with for seven weeks it would otherwise have spent waiting. Whether that trade is worth making depends entirely on what the $34,000 did.
Illustrative figures
Illustrative on stated assumptions and rounded. Not a quote or offer of credit.
The pricing
Indicative structures rather than any funderโs published rates. The point is what each fee is calculated on, because that is what makes two quotes comparable.
| Fee | Charged on | Behaves like | Moves with |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discount fee | The amount advanced | Interest | How long the invoice takes to pay |
| Service fee | The face value of invoices funded | A transaction charge | How much is put through |
| Facility or line fee | The agreed limit | A standing charge | Nothing, it is fixed |
| Set-up fee | The facility, once | An establishment cost | Nothing |
| Disbursements | Searches and audits | A pass-through | How often reviews happen |
Indicative fee structures. Any particular facility is priced by its funder after assessment.
The comparison trap
A facility quoted at 1.2% looks cheap beside a term loan quoted at 14%. The two numbers are measuring different periods, and converting the first to an annual equivalent puts it in a different place entirely. Add the service fee, which is charged on face value rather than on the advance, and the gap moves again. Asking a funder for the total cost on a stated volume over twelve months, in dollars, is the question that makes two offers comparable, and any funder can answer it.
Against the alternatives
All four fund a gap. They differ on what they are secured by, how fast they can be arranged and how the cost behaves as the business grows.
| Feature | Invoice finance | Term loan | Overdraft |
|---|---|---|---|
| Secured against | The receivables ledger | The business, sometimes assets | The business, sometimes assets |
| Limit grows with turnover | Yes, automatically | No | Only on review |
| Available with a short trading history | Frequently | Less often | Less often |
| Cost basis | Per invoice and per day drawn | Fixed schedule | Per day drawn |
| Customer contact | None under a confidential facility | None | None |
| Suits a business whose problem is | Slow-paying customers | A one-off purchase | Small timing wobbles |
The distinguishing feature is the second row. A facility that sizes off the ledger grows as the business wins work, which is exactly the point at which a fixed limit becomes the constraint.
Who it suits
The common thread is a business selling to other businesses on credit terms, with a ledger of real invoices behind it.
Winning more work consumes cash before it produces it. A facility that scales with the ledger removes the constraint that arrives precisely when things are going well.
Where the customers are large and creditworthy but pay on their own schedule, the receivable is strong and the wait is the problem. That is the case the product was designed for.
A business whose main cost is wages has to pay before it bills, and has little to offer a secured lender. The ledger is the asset it does have.
Staged work billed on completion of milestones leaves long gaps between outlay and receipt. Funding against each certified stage closes them.
The trade
The process
Generalised rather than specific to any funder. The sequence is broadly consistent even where the detail is not.
01
Ordinarily quick where the report is current
The funder looks at who the business invoices, how much each customer owes, how old the debt is and how reliably it pays. The aged receivables report is the single most informative document in the file.
Documents commonly required
02
Entity details, bank statements and existing commitments, as with any facility. The weighting differs from a term application because the ledger carries more of the decision, and it is still an assessment of the business.
Documents commonly required
03
The advance rate, the fees, any concentration limits and the security position are set out. A general security agreement is common, and a registration on the Personal Property Securities Register follows.
Documents commonly required
04
Invoices are loaded, the notification arrangement is confirmed, and the first advance is released. From there the facility runs invoice by invoice rather than as a single event.
No timings are published here. They vary by funder, by the state of the ledger and by how complete the file is, and a page naming a number would be describing a promise nobody made.
When it goes wrong
General descriptions. What happens in any particular case depends on the facility agreement.
Most facilities are with recourse, which means an invoice that goes unpaid past an agreed period is recharged to the business rather than absorbed by the funder. The advance has to be repaid or offset against other invoices.
What happens:The cash arrived early and then has to be found again, which is the risk that makes customer quality matter.
A disputed invoice is ordinarily not fundable, and one already funded can be pulled back. Funders take this seriously because a dispute means the receivable may not exist in the form the invoice describes.
What happens:Funding is withdrawn on that invoice at the point the business is least able to absorb it.
Where a single customer represents a large share of the ledger, funders cap how much of it they will fund. A business with one dominant customer can find its usable limit far below its headline one.
What happens:The facility is smaller in practice than the agreement suggests, which is worth establishing before relying on it.
The pattern behind all three is that the funder is buying the quality of the receivable rather than the enthusiasm of the business. Clean invoicing, documented delivery and good customer records are what keep a facility working.
The honest limit
It funds a timing problem. Where a business is profitable and simply waiting, bringing the cash forward is a genuine solution and the fee is the price of not waiting. Where a business is not profitable, invoice finance brings forward money that was going to be insufficient anyway, and adds a cost to it.
That distinction is worth being blunt about, because the speed and accessibility of the product make it easy to reach for in the second situation. The test is whether the gap being funded is between earning and being paid, or between earning and spending. Only the first is a timing problem.
It also does nothing about the underlying payment behaviour. A business whose customers pay at 60 days on 30-day terms still has customers who pay at 60 days, and it is now paying to bridge that every month. Alongside a facility, the ordinary work of tightening terms, invoicing promptly and following up early is what reduces how much of the facility is needed.
The cost of being drawn
A receivables facility charges on what is drawn rather than on the limit, so this shows the interest cost of an average drawn balance rather than a repayment. The service fee sits on top of it. Indicative only, and not a quote or offer of credit.
Indicative interest cost
Weekly
$162/week
Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.
Sending to Prospa
$60,000 drawn at 14.00% . Prospa will ask a few quick questions, then provide a firm quote and funding if eligible.
Redirecting…
References
Backs the description of the security registration a receivables facility ordinarily involves.
The register used to confirm the entities involved in a facility.
The regulator whose guidance covers lender conduct and fee disclosure.
Referenced for the point that GST on an invoice is accounted for under the businessโs own basis rather than by the funder.
Backs the distinction between general information of this kind and regulated financial advice.
FAQ
A facility that advances a proportion of an unpaid invoice shortly after it is issued, with the balance released when the customer pays, less the funderโs fees. It funds the gap between doing the work and being paid for it.
Commonly between 70% and 90% of the value, depending on the funder, the customer and the sector. The remainder is held back and released on payment, which is what protects the funder against credit notes and short payments.
Under a confidential arrangement, ordinarily not. The business continues to invoice and collect in its own name and the customer sees nothing different. A disclosed arrangement is a different product, and factoring is where that sits.
Two fees rather than one. A discount fee charged on the amount advanced for as long as it is outstanding, and a service fee charged on the face value of invoices funded. A quote naming only the first understates the cost, sometimes considerably.
Ordinarily higher per dollar, because the funder is taking on the collection risk of a ledger rather than a single scheduled repayment. What it buys is availability and a limit that grows, which a term facility does not offer.
Most New Zealand facilities are with recourse, so an invoice unpaid past an agreed period is recharged to the business. Non-recourse arrangements exist, cost more, and shift some of that risk to the funder subject to their own conditions.
It depends on the arrangement. Selective facilities fund chosen invoices, whole-of-ledger facilities require all of them. The selective version is more flexible and ordinarily prices higher, because the funder sees less of the picture.
Ordinarily a general security agreement over the business, registered on the Personal Property Securities Register. Where an existing lender already holds a general security, the two positions have to be resolved before a facility can start.
Sometimes, with a lower usable limit. Funders cap how much of a single debtor they will fund, so a concentrated ledger produces a facility smaller than its headline. Establishing that cap early avoids planning around money that will not be available.
It varies by funder and by how current the aged receivables report is, and no timing is published here. What is consistent is that once a facility is running, individual advances are fast, because the assessment work is already done.
The GST on an invoice is accounted for by the business under its own accounting basis rather than by the funder, and how a facility interacts with that is a matter for the accountant. The funder is advancing against the invoice rather than buying the supply.
No. It describes how a product works in general terms. This site is not a lender, a broker or a registered financial adviser, and whether a facility suits a particular business depends on facts a website cannot see.
Related
Invoice factoring
The disclosed version, where the funder collects.
Read onDebtor finance
The whole-of-ledger facility with a moving limit.
Read onWhat invoice finance actually costs
The two fees, converted into one comparable number.
Read onBridging a late-paying debtor
The situation this product exists for.
Read onAll eight products
Every facility compared in the same shape.
Read onDisclaimer
A working capital facility is a commitment serviced out of the same operating cash flow as everything else, and the fees recur for as long as it is used. Modelling the weekly cost against the trading position before committing is what this site is built for. Borrowing at a level that stays comfortable through a quiet quarter, rather than only through a strong one, is widely regarded as the safer frame.
What this site is
A calculator and information tool. Not a lender, not a broker, not a registered financial adviser. Nothing here is personalised financial advice.
What the figures show
Modelled estimates based on the inputs shown. Not a quote. Not an offer of credit. Not a guarantee of approval, rate or fees.
What the lender decides
Final rates, fees, and approval are set by the lender after a CCCFA-appropriate assessment of the applicant's circumstances and credit decision.
Commercial disclosure
Workingcapital.org.nz earns a commission from Prospa when a visitor applies through this site and their application is approved. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and it does not influence the rate Prospa offers. Full disclosure on the partner page.
Tax, GST, and accountant framing
Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) are general in nature and subject to the accountant's confirmation on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional advice from a registered financial adviser or chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame.