01
Invoicing more
New invoices to approved customers add to the base immediately. This is the property that makes the facility suit a growing business, because funding scales with activity rather than with an annual review.
Debtor finance funds the whole receivables book as a revolving facility. The available limit is recalculated from the ledger rather than fixed at the start, which is what makes it behave differently from every other facility a business is offered.
Last reviewed 8 September 2026
Indicative interest cost
Weekly
$500/week
Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.
Sending to Prospa
$200,000 drawn at 13.00% . Prospa will ask a few quick questions, then provide a firm quote and funding if eligible.
Redirecting…
The short version
The mechanism
The calculation starts with the total owed to the business and then removes everything the funder will not lend against. Invoices older than an agreed age come out. Debt owed by related parties comes out. Disputed invoices, credit notes and contra accounts come out. Debt owed by customers the funder will not take comes out.
What remains is then capped for concentration. Where one customer represents more of the ledger than the funder is comfortable with, the excess above that share is removed as well, which is the step that most often produces a smaller number than the business expected.
A percentage of the surviving figure is the available limit. Because every input moves as the business trades, the limit is recalculated continuously rather than set once. That is the defining property of the product, and it is the reason the facility feels different to operate from an overdraft.
Start with
Gross receivables
Remove
Ineligible debt
Cap
Concentration
Advance
A percentage of the rest
Worked base
Illustrative on stated assumptions. The sequence and the direction are what matter, since every funder sets its own eligibility rules.
| Step | Adjustment | Running figure |
|---|---|---|
| Gross receivables | $600,000 | |
| Less invoices past 90 days | -$48,000 | $552,000 |
| Less related-party debt | -$22,000 | $530,000 |
| Less disputed and credited | -$15,000 | $515,000 |
| Less concentration above the cap | -$65,000 | $450,000 |
| Eligible receivables | $450,000 | |
| Advance at 80% | $360,000 available |
Illustrative borrowing base on stated assumptions. Not an offer of credit.
Reading the table
The example starts at $600,000 and ends with $360,000 available, which is well under the gross figure and well under the headline advance rate applied to it. Nothing improper happened. The advance rate applies to eligible receivables, and the eligibility rules removed a quarter of the book before the percentage was applied.
That gap is where most disappointment with this product lives. A business quoted an 80% advance against a $600,000 ledger reasonably expects something near $480,000, and the number that arrives is a third lower. The rules producing that were all in the agreement.
The practical response is to build the base before signing rather than after. Running the funderโs eligibility rules across the current aged receivables report takes an hour and produces the real number, and a funder will ordinarily help with it because the alternative is a facility neither party is happy with.
What moves the limit
01
New invoices to approved customers add to the base immediately. This is the property that makes the facility suit a growing business, because funding scales with activity rather than with an annual review.
02
A payment reduces the ledger and therefore the base, at the same time as it puts cash in the account. The two offset, which is why the facility feels stable in normal trading.
03
An invoice crossing the eligibility age drops out entirely. A month where several large invoices age at once can reduce the available limit noticeably, and it happens without warning unless the ledger is being watched.
04
Winning a large contract can push one customer above the concentration cap, which removes the excess from the base. Growth in the wrong shape can reduce the facility.
The one to watch
A month where customers pay slowly is a month where invoices age out of the base, which reduces the available limit while the cash shortfall is growing. That is the opposite of how a business intuitively expects a facility to behave, and it is inherent to sizing against a ledger rather than against a business. A weekly look at the aged receivables report against the eligibility rules turns that from a surprise into a forecast.
Against the alternatives
All three are receivables facilities. They differ on scope, on who collects and on how the limit is set.
| Feature | Debtor finance | Invoice finance | Factoring |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope | Whole ledger | Whole ledger or selected | Whole ledger |
| Who collects | Ordinarily the business | The business | The funder |
| Disclosed to customers | Ordinarily not | Not under a confidential facility | Yes |
| Limit set by | A borrowing base | Per invoice | A borrowing base |
| Reporting burden | Highest | Moderate | Moderate |
| Suits | A larger, growing ledger | Selective or smaller needs | A business with no credit control |
The reporting row is the one businesses underestimate. A borrowing base has to be substantiated, which means the ledger has to be accurate and current in a way it may not have been before.
The trade
The process
Generalised rather than specific to any funder. This is the most document-heavy of the receivables facilities.
01
The funder builds a borrowing base from the current aged receivables report and historic ones, looking at ageing patterns, dilution from credit notes, and concentration. Historic reports matter as much as the current one, because they show how the ledger behaves rather than how it looks today.
Documents commonly required
02
Financial statements, management accounts, bank statements and existing facilities. A debtor finance facility is ordinarily larger than an invoice finance one, and the assessment is correspondingly deeper.
Documents commonly required
03
Sample invoice verification, and in many cases an on-site review of the systems producing the ledger. The funder is lending against a report, so it wants to see how the report is generated.
04
Facility agreement, security documents and the reporting schedule, which sets out how often the base is resubmitted. The reporting rhythm is a real operational commitment and is worth agreeing deliberately.
Documents commonly required
When it goes wrong
Several large invoices age past eligibility at once and the available limit drops sharply while the business is already short.
What happens:A funding shortfall arriving at the worst possible moment, from a mechanism that was disclosed all along.
Credit notes, rebates and short payments reduce what the ledger actually converts to. Funders track this as dilution and adjust the advance rate where it runs high.
What happens:A lower advance rate applied at review, reducing the facility without any change in turnover.
A borrowing base that is not submitted on time can suspend availability, because the funder no longer knows what it is lending against.
What happens:A facility that stops working for administrative reasons rather than credit ones, which is avoidable and common.
All three are operational rather than commercial. A business that runs a clean, current ledger and submits on time avoids most of what goes wrong with this product, and one that does not will find the facility unreliable regardless of how it was priced.
Who it is genuinely for
A business selling to other businesses on credit terms, with a ledger large enough to justify the setup and the reporting, a spread of customers rather than one dominant account, and a growth trajectory that a fixed limit would keep interrupting. That combination is what the product was built for and where it clearly outperforms an overdraft.
Below a certain ledger size the administrative load stops being worth it, and selective invoice funding does the same job with far less overhead. Where the ledger is concentrated in one or two customers, the concentration cap removes so much of the base that the facility disappoints regardless of how well everything else fits.
The other precondition is a finance function capable of producing an accurate aged receivables report on a schedule. That sounds like a small thing and it is the operational hinge of the whole arrangement, because the report is what the limit is calculated from.
The cost of being drawn
A revolving facility charges on what is drawn rather than on the limit, so this shows the interest cost of an average drawn balance. Service and audit fees sit on top of it. Indicative only, and not a quote or offer of credit.
Indicative interest cost
Weekly
$500/week
Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.
Sending to Prospa
$200,000 drawn at 13.00% . Prospa will ask a few quick questions, then provide a firm quote and funding if eligible.
Redirecting…
References
Backs the description of the general security registration a debtor finance facility ordinarily involves.
The register used to confirm entities and related-party relationships during a ledger review.
The regulator whose guidance covers conduct and fee disclosure.
Context for how receivables and their impairment are presented in financial statements.
Backs the distinction between general information of this kind and regulated financial advice.
FAQ
A revolving facility secured on the whole receivables ledger, where the available limit is calculated from a borrowing base rather than fixed at the outset. It rises as the business invoices and falls as debt ages or is paid.
The calculation that turns a gross ledger into an available limit. Ineligible debt is removed, a concentration cap is applied to any customer above an agreed share, and a percentage of what remains is advanced.
Because the advance rate applies to eligible receivables rather than to the gross ledger. Aged, disputed, related-party and over-concentrated debt is removed first, which commonly reduces the base by a fifth or more before any percentage is applied.
Ordinarily age past an agreed period, a dispute, a credit note, a contra account with the same party, a related-party relationship, or a customer the funder will not take. The specific rules are in the agreement and they vary between funders.
A limit on how much of the base any single customer can represent. Where one customer exceeds it, the excess is removed. It exists because a funder lending against a ledger dominated by one debtor is effectively lending against that debtor.
Ordinarily not. Debtor finance is generally confidential, with the business continuing to invoice and collect in its own name. Where collections move to the funder, the arrangement is closer to factoring.
The gap between what the ledger says is owed and what it actually converts to in cash, caused by credit notes, rebates, settlement discounts and short payments. Funders measure it, and persistent high dilution reduces the advance rate.
More than any other receivables facility. A borrowing base has to be submitted on an agreed schedule, supported by an accurate aged receivables report, with periodic audits. A business without a reliable finance function will find this the hardest part.
The facility is over-advanced and the agreement sets out what follows, which ordinarily means repaying the excess. Watching the base against the drawn balance weekly is what prevents this arriving unannounced.
Per dollar, ordinarily yes, because the funder has the whole book and better visibility. Once the reporting overhead and audit costs are counted the comparison narrows, and for a smaller ledger selective funding frequently comes out ahead.
It can, and the two behave differently. An overdraft has a fixed limit reviewed periodically; a debtor finance limit moves continuously with the ledger. Which is better depends on whether the business would rather have certainty or growth.
No. It describes how a product works in general terms. This site is not a lender, a broker or a registered financial adviser, and whether a facility suits a particular business depends on facts a website cannot see.
Related
Invoice finance
The selective alternative, with far less reporting.
Read onInvoice factoring
Where collections move to the funder as well.
Read onInvoice finance against factoring
The three receivables options, separated properly.
Read onWhat lenders assess
Why the ledger carries so much of this decision.
Read onAll eight products
Every facility compared in the same shape.
Read onDisclaimer
A working capital facility is a commitment serviced out of the same operating cash flow as everything else, and the fees recur for as long as it is used. Modelling the weekly cost against the trading position before committing is what this site is built for. Borrowing at a level that stays comfortable through a quiet quarter, rather than only through a strong one, is widely regarded as the safer frame.
What this site is
A calculator and information tool. Not a lender, not a broker, not a registered financial adviser. Nothing here is personalised financial advice.
What the figures show
Modelled estimates based on the inputs shown. Not a quote. Not an offer of credit. Not a guarantee of approval, rate or fees.
What the lender decides
Final rates, fees, and approval are set by the lender after a CCCFA-appropriate assessment of the applicant's circumstances and credit decision.
Commercial disclosure
Workingcapital.org.nz earns a commission from Prospa when a visitor applies through this site and their application is approved. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and it does not influence the rate Prospa offers. Full disclosure on the partner page.
Tax, GST, and accountant framing
Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) are general in nature and subject to the accountant's confirmation on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional advice from a registered financial adviser or chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame.