01
A separate GST account
Moving the GST portion out of the trading account as revenue lands means the money is there when the return falls due. It is the single most effective fix and it takes an afternoon to set up.
Tax dates are fixed and trading is not. The gap is entirely predictable, which is what makes it the most avoidable of the working capital problems on this site and one of the most common.
Last reviewed 8 September 2026
Indicative repayment
Weekly
$958/week
Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.
Sending to Prospa
9 months at 16.00% . Prospa will ask a few quick questions, then provide a firm quote and funding if eligible.
Redirecting…
The short version
Why it happens
GST arrives in the trading account with every sale and sits there indistinguishable from revenue. Over a two-month period a business turning over $300,000 has collected a substantial sum that belongs to Inland Revenue, and it has been available to pay wages, suppliers and rent throughout.
When the return falls due, the money has to be there. Where trading has been steady the business simply pays it out of the current month. Where trading has softened, the current month does not cover a liability accrued when things were busier, and the shortfall appears.
Provisional tax has the same shape with a longer lag. It is calculated on a prior year or an estimate, and it lands on dates that take no account of how the current year is going. A business having a poorer year than the last one pays instalments sized for the better one.
GST collected
On every sale
Held
Until the return
Frequently used
For trading in between
Due
On a fixed date
The order of operations
01
A provisional tax position can sometimes be re-estimated where the current year is genuinely tracking below the basis the instalments were calculated on, and the options for doing so depend on the method the business uses. That is a conversation with the accountant and it has to happen before the date rather than after it.
02
Instalment arrangements are ordinary and are dealt with routinely. Approaching before a date is missed puts the business in a materially better position than approaching afterwards, and the department publishes what is available rather than deciding case by case in secret.
03
Where an arrangement is unavailable or its cost exceeds a facility, borrowing to pay is a straightforward commercial decision. It belongs third in this list rather than first, because the two steps above are frequently cheaper and are skipped out of discomfort rather than analysis.
The comparison
Illustrative on stated assumptions. Inland Revenue publishes its own rates and they change, so the figures below are shape rather than fact.
| Route | What it involves | Indicative cost basis |
|---|---|---|
| Pay on time | Cash is available | Nothing |
| Instalment arrangement | Agreed with Inland Revenue before the date | Use of money interest, and possibly reduced penalties |
| Short-term facility | A lender advances the amount | A fee or rate set by the lender |
| Receivables facility | Drawing against the ledger | Charged on the drawn amount for the days drawn |
| Pay late without contact | Nothing arranged | Interest and penalties, and a worse starting position later |
Indicative comparison. Inland Revenue publishes current interest and penalty settings, and an accountant should confirm any particular position.
The row that matters
The worst outcome in the comparison above is the last one, and it is chosen more often than any of the others. A missed date with no contact attracts interest and penalties, and it makes a later arrangement harder to reach. Inland Revenue deals with businesses in difficulty routinely, and the difference between an early conversation and a late one is measured in both money and options. Where paying is going to be a problem, the call is worth making before the date rather than after.
The framing
There is a persistent idea that funding a tax payment is a sign of a business in trouble, and it does more harm than good. A tax liability is an ordinary obligation with a date on it, and funding it is the same class of decision as funding stock or payroll. Where the cost of the facility is lower than the cost of not paying, borrowing is straightforwardly the right answer.
What the discomfort produces is delay, and delay is what makes the position worse. A business that spends three weeks reluctant to talk to anyone arrives at the date with fewer options than it had, and frequently pays more for the one it takes.
The genuine warning sign is not one funded tax payment. It is a pattern of them, quarter after quarter, which says the business is operating on money that was never its own and is now permanently behind. That is a structural position and it needs an accountant looking at the whole picture rather than another facility.
Prevention
None of these requires a facility, and together they mean the date stops being an event.
01
Moving the GST portion out of the trading account as revenue lands means the money is there when the return falls due. It is the single most effective fix and it takes an afternoon to set up.
02
A weekly or monthly transfer sized against the expected liability spreads a lumpy obligation across the period it was earned in, which is where it belongs.
03
Tax dates that live only in the accountantโs system arrive as news. In the businessโs own calendar, alongside payroll and rent, they are planned for like any other outgoing.
04
A rough calculation halfway through a period shows what is coming while there is still time to do something about it, rather than at the point the return is prepared.
Funding a tax payment
The honest limit
A one-off shortfall around a tax date is a cash-flow event and it is unremarkable. A business that is short at every GST date is operating on money it collected on someone elseโs behalf, and the underlying position is worse than the tax problem it presents as.
That is worth saying plainly because the funding options above will keep working for several quarters, and each one makes the eventual reckoning larger. The point at which an accountant should be looking at the whole position is the second occurrence rather than the fifth.
Nothing on this page is tax advice, and the treatment of any particular liability depends on the businessโs circumstances, its provisional tax method and its history with the department. Inland Revenue is the primary source and the accountant is the right adviser.
The calendar
Filing frequencies and instalment dates are published by Inland Revenue and depend on the businessโs turnover and elected method. The point below is the shape of the mismatch rather than any particular date.
| Obligation | Calculated on | Arrives |
|---|---|---|
| GST | A period already traded | On a fixed date after that period |
| Provisional tax | A prior year or an estimate | On fixed instalment dates |
| PAYE | Wages already paid | Monthly or twice monthly |
| Terminal tax | A year already finished | After the return is filed |
Indicative of the shape rather than a schedule. Inland Revenue publishes the applicable dates and frequencies.
Reading the table
Each obligation is calculated on a period that has already happened and paid out of a period that is happening now. In a steady business that is unremarkable, because the two periods look similar. In a business whose trading moves, it means a liability sized in a strong quarter is paid out of a weak one.
That is why a seasonal business feels tax dates more sharply than a steady one, and why a business coming off a strong year can find its provisional instalments uncomfortable in a softer one. Neither is a failure of planning so much as a consequence of how the system is built.
It is also why the accountant conversation belongs before the date rather than after. Where a current year is genuinely tracking below the basis the instalments were calculated on, the options for doing something about that depend on the method the business uses and on acting in time.
The cost of funding it
A facility used to meet a dated liability is an ordinary term facility, and this is what one costs. Set it against the published Inland Revenue position before deciding. Indicative only, and not a quote or offer of credit.
Indicative repayment
Weekly
$958/week
Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.
Sending to Prospa
9 months at 16.00% . Prospa will ask a few quick questions, then provide a firm quote and funding if eligible.
Redirecting…
References
The published source for GST return periods and due dates.
The published source for provisional tax methods, instalment dates and re-estimation.
The published source for instalment arrangements referred to throughout this page.
The published source for what accrues where a liability is not paid on time.
Referenced for the point that a recurring shortfall is a question for a chartered accountant.
FAQ
Because GST arrives in the trading account with every sale and is indistinguishable from revenue, so it is available to spend before the return falls due. Where trading softens between collection and payment, the current month cannot cover a liability accrued in a busier one.
The dates themselves are fixed. What is available is an instalment arrangement with Inland Revenue, which spreads the payment rather than moving the date, and which is dealt with routinely when approached early.
It depends on the cost of each, and the arrangement should be priced before the facility is arranged rather than after. Inland Revenue publishes its interest and penalty settings, so the comparison can be done properly.
It is an ordinary process rather than an adverse event, and it is far better than a missed date with no contact. What follows in any particular case depends on the circumstances, and the accountant is the right person to explain the consequences.
Sometimes, where the current year is genuinely tracking below the basis the instalments were calculated on, and the options depend on the method the business uses. It is a conversation with the accountant and it has to happen before the date.
Interest and penalties accrue as published, and a later arrangement is harder to reach from a worse starting position. It is the most expensive of the available routes and the one chosen most often.
One occurrence is a cash-flow event and is unremarkable. A pattern across several quarters says the business is operating on money it collected on someone elseโs behalf, and that is a structural position needing an accountant rather than another facility.
A separate account holding the GST portion as revenue arrives. It costs nothing, it takes an afternoon to set up, and it commonly removes the problem permanently.
Where a receivables or revolving facility already exists, drawing on it is ordinarily cheapest. Where nothing exists, a term facility sized to the liability is the usual shape, and a short-term facility is the expensive last option.
A single funded liability is unremarkable. Repeated short-term facilities around tax dates are visible to a later lender and read as a pattern rather than as an event, which is one more reason to address the cause.
Before the date, yes. Re-estimation options, the arrangement process and the interaction with the wider position are all things an accountant can act on while there is still time, and none of them once the date has passed.
No. It is general information about a common situation. This site is not a chartered accountant or a registered financial adviser, Inland Revenue is the primary source, and any particular liability is a question for the businessโs accountant.
Related
Working capital loan
The usual shape where a facility is the right answer.
Read onInvoice finance
Cheaper again where a receivables ledger exists.
Read onA seasonal cash-flow gap
Why the date so often lands in the wrong month.
Read onWhat working capital is
Sizing the position before the date arrives.
Read onAll eight products
Every facility compared in the same shape.
Read onDisclaimer
A working capital facility is a commitment serviced out of the same operating cash flow as everything else, and the fees recur for as long as it is used. Modelling the weekly cost against the trading position before committing is what this site is built for. Borrowing at a level that stays comfortable through a quiet quarter, rather than only through a strong one, is widely regarded as the safer frame.
What this site is
A calculator and information tool. Not a lender, not a broker, not a registered financial adviser. Nothing here is personalised financial advice.
What the figures show
Modelled estimates based on the inputs shown. Not a quote. Not an offer of credit. Not a guarantee of approval, rate or fees.
What the lender decides
Final rates, fees, and approval are set by the lender after a CCCFA-appropriate assessment of the applicant's circumstances and credit decision.
Commercial disclosure
Workingcapital.org.nz earns a commission from Prospa when a visitor applies through this site and their application is approved. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and it does not influence the rate Prospa offers. Full disclosure on the partner page.
Tax, GST, and accountant framing
Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) are general in nature and subject to the accountant's confirmation on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional advice from a registered financial adviser or chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame.